Multi-agent systems and CWIC flow: Pioneering AI orchestration

Introduction to multi-agent systems

Multi-agent systems represent a paradigm shift in artificial intelligence, moving beyond single-model approaches to orchestrated teams of specialized AI agents working collaboratively. These systems provide several key advantages:

• Specialization: Each agent can focus on what it does best
• Checks and balances: Agents can review and refine each other’s work
• Scalability: Systems can grow to include additional specialized agents
• Robustness: The system doesn’t rely on a single agent’s capabilities

In a multi-agent system, specialized AI agents with distinct roles collaborate to solve complex problems that would be challenging for a single agent. This approach mirrors human team collaboration, where different specialists contribute their expertise to achieve a common goal.

Zoom image will be displayed

CWIC flow: Clearwater’s pioneering multi-agent system

At Clearwater Analytics, we embarked on a journey to build an AI-driven multi-agent system long before frameworks like LangGraph emerged. Our solution, Clearwater Intelligent Console Flow (CWIC Flow), is a sophisticated AI platform that supports knowledge, application, and data awareness. Unlike traditional chatbot solutions, CWIC Flow orchestrates specialists — intelligent agents with tools, skills, and memory — to deliver highly contextualized and actionable insights to our clients. This architectural leap positioned Clearwater ahead of the curve, showcasing a multi-agent AI system before the industry widely adopted such paradigms.

The architecture of CWIC flow

CWIC Flow integrates a hierarchy of intelligent components:

1. CWIC Tools: These provide access to external APIs, databases, and computational resources, enabling AI agents to interact with structured and unstructured data.
2. CWIC Skills: Orchestrated workflows that combine multiple tools, allowing the system to solve complex tasks efficiently.
3. CWIC Specialists: Autonomous agents trained for specific investment and financial tasks. They leverage tools, skills, and a refined knowledge base to process client queries dynamically.
4. Planning and Memory: CWIC Flow maintains short- and long-term memory, enabling specialists to learn from interactions and refine their decision-making over time. This leads to a more adaptive and responsive AI system.

Through this layered approach, CWIC Flow achieves real-time data awareness, contextual reasoning, and seamless automation, reducing operational overhead while enhancing user experience. The platform supports RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) techniques, tool chaining, and LLM-based decision-making, all within a governed AI framework that ensures accuracy and compliance.

More details about CWIC architecture can be found in the article Constructing the Ultimate Gen AI Chat/Copilot Experience (Part 1).

Zoom image will be displayed

The CWIC flow advantage

While new frameworks, such as LangGraph, now provide structured workflows for multi-agent AI applications, Clearwater Analytics had already developed a similar, robust system before these frameworks became mainstream. The key differentiators of CWIC Flow include:

• Early Implementation of Multi-Agent Workflows: CWIC Flow was designed to coordinate multiple specialists before frameworks like LangGraph formalized multi-agent orchestration.
• Domain-Specific AI Agents: Our specialists possess deep financial expertise, offering highly accurate and context-driven insights.
• Production-Ready Governance: Unlike generic frameworks, CWIC Flow integrates strict access control, audit logging, and AI guardrails to ensure data security and compliance.
• Seamless Cloud Integration: CWIC Flow leverages AWS, Azure, and Snowflake for real-time data processing, ensuring clients receive the most up-to-date information.

For a demo of our Multi-Agent system, you can watch the Webinar: How Clearwater Analytics Creates Agentic Systems with SLMs.

Zoom image will be displayed

CWIC Flow represents a very complex multi-agent system that has been developed and refined over time at Clearwater Analytics. Before we delve deeper into the intricacies of CWIC Flow’s architecture, it’s beneficial to understand the fundamental concepts of multi-agent systems through a simpler implementation. In this article, we’ll build a straightforward multi-agent system using LangChain. This approach allows us to illustrate the core principles of agent collaboration, specialized roles, and orchestrated workflows in a more accessible manner. By starting with this foundation, readers can better appreciate the sophisticated design choices and advanced capabilities that make CWIC Flow such a powerful enterprise solution. The concepts demonstrated in our LangChain example — though simpler — share the same fundamental principles that underpin CWIC Flow’s more comprehensive implementation.

Building a simple multi-agent system

While frameworks like LangGraph provide structured ways to build multi-agent systems, it’s important to understand that you can create effective multi-agent architectures without specialized frameworks. Let’s explore a straightforward approach to building a multi-agent system using basic Python and LangChain components.

What we’ll build

Zoom image will be displayed

Throughout this article, we’ll build a collaborative research assistant system with multiple specialized agents:

1. A researcher agent that gathers information
2. A critic agent that evaluates and challenges findings
3. A writer agent that synthesizes information into coherent text
4. A coordinator agent that manages the workflow between agents

By the end of this article, you’ll have a fully functional multi-agent system that can perform research tasks collaboratively.

Let’s start by setting up our environment!

Setting up the environment

First, we need to set up our environment with the necessary packages:

# Install required packages
!pip install langchain python-dotenv openai langchain-community langchain-openai

# Load environment variables
import os
from dotenv import load_dotenv

load_dotenv()  # Load API keys from .env file

# Verify that the API key is loaded
if os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY") is None:
    print("Warning: OPENAI_API_KEY not found in environment variables.")
else:
    print("OPENAI_API_KEY found in environment variables.")

Designing agent prompts

The foundation of our multi-agent system is well-crafted system prompts that define each agent’s role and responsibilities:

The researcher agent

RESEARCHER_SYSTEM_PROMPT = """
You are a Researcher Agent, part of a collaborative research assistant system.
Your role is to gather and provide accurate, relevant information on any
topic or question presented to you.

Your responsibilities include:
1. Analyzing research questions to understand what information is being
   requested
2. Providing comprehensive, well-structured responses based on your knowledge
3. Highlighting key points and important information
4. Being honest about the limitations of your knowledge
5. Maintaining objectivity and avoiding bias in your responses

Format your responses in a clear, organized manner with sections, bullet
points, or numbered lists as appropriate.
Always cite your sources of information when possible.

Remember, your goal is to provide the most helpful, accurate information 
possible to assist in the research process.
"""

def researcher_agent(messages):
    """Researcher agent that analyzes questions and provides informative
       responses."""
    # Add the system prompt to guide the researcher agent's behavior
    researcher_messages = [SystemMessage(content=RESEARCHER_SYSTEM_PROMPT)] + messages
    
    # Create a ChatOpenAI instance
    llm = ChatOpenAI(
        temperature=0.5,  # Lower temperature for more factual responses
        model_name="gpt-4o",
        openai_api_key=os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY")
    )
    
    # Get a response from the LLM
    response = llm(researcher_messages)
    
    print("\n--- Researcher Agent Response ---")
    print(f"{response.content[:300]}...\n")
    
    return response

The critic agent

CRITIC_SYSTEM_PROMPT = """
You are a Critic Agent, part of a collaborative research assistant system. 
Your role is to evaluate and challenge information provided by the Researcher
Agent to ensure accuracy, completeness, and objectivity.

Your responsibilities include:
1. Analyzing research findings for accuracy, completeness, and potential biases
2. Identifying gaps in the information or logical inconsistencies
3. Asking important questions that might have been overlooked
4. Suggesting improvements or alternative perspectives
5. Ensuring that the final information is balanced and well-rounded

Be constructive in your criticism. Your goal is not to dismiss the 
researcher's work, but to strengthen it. Format your feedback in a 
clear, organized manner, highlighting specific points that need attention.

Remember, your ultimate goal is to ensure that the final research output 
is of the highest quality possible.
"""

def critic_agent(messages):
    """Critic agent that evaluates and challenges the researcher's findings."""
    # Add the system prompt to guide the critic agent's behavior
    critic_messages = [SystemMessage(content=CRITIC_SYSTEM_PROMPT)] + messages
    
    # Create a ChatOpenAI instance
    llm = ChatOpenAI(
        temperature=0.7,  # Slightly higher temperature for more creative criticism
        model_name="gpt-4o",
        openai_api_key=os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY")
    )
    
    # Get a response from the LLM
    response = llm(critic_messages)
    
    print("\n--- Critic Agent Response ---")
    print(f"{response.content[:300]}...\n")
    
    return response

The writer agent

WRITER_SYSTEM_PROMPT = """
You are a Writer Agent, part of a collaborative research assistant system. 
Your role is to synthesize information from the Researcher Agent and feedback 
from the Critic Agent into a coherent, well-written response.

Your responsibilities include:
1. Analyzing the information provided by the researcher and the feedback 
   from the critic
2. Organizing the information in a logical, easy-to-understand structure
3. Presenting the information in a clear, engaging writing style
4. Balancing different perspectives and ensuring objectivity
5. Creating a final response that is comprehensive, accurate, and well-written

Format your response in a clear, organized manner with appropriate headings, 
paragraphs, and bullet points.
Use simple language to explain complex concepts, and provide examples where 
helpful.

Remember, your goal is to create a final response that effectively 
communicates the information to the user.
"""

def writer_agent(messages):
    """Writer agent that synthesizes information from the researcher and critic."""
    # Add the system prompt to guide the writer agent's behavior
    writer_messages = [SystemMessage(content=WRITER_SYSTEM_PROMPT)] + messages
    
    # Create a ChatOpenAI instance
    llm = ChatOpenAI(
        temperature=0.6,  # Balanced temperature for creativity and accuracy
        model_name="gpt-4o",
        openai_api_key=os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY")
    )
    
    # Get a response from the LLM
    response = llm(writer_messages)
    
    print("\n--- Writer Agent Response ---")
    print(f"{response.content[:300]}...\n")
    
    return response

The coordinator agent

As with our other agents, we’ll start by defining a system prompt that outlines the coordinator’s role and responsibilities:

# Define the system prompts for each agent
COORDINATOR_SYSTEM_PROMPT = """
You are a Coordinator Agent, responsible for managing the workflow between specialized agents in a collaborative 
research assistant system. Your role is to analyze queries, determine which agents should be involved, and ensure 
that the final response meets the user's needs.

Your team includes:
1. Researcher Agent: Gathers and provides accurate, relevant information on topics
2. Critic Agent: Evaluates and challenges information to ensure accuracy and completeness
3. Writer Agent: Synthesizes information into coherent, well-written responses

Your responsibilities include:
1. Analyzing the user's query to determine which agents should be involved
2. Deciding the order in which agents should process the query
3. Determining when additional research or feedback is needed
4. Ensuring that the final response meets the user's needs

For each query, you must decide on one of the following next steps:
- "researcher": Send the query to the researcher agent first
- "done": The query has been fully addressed and no further action is needed

Format your response as a JSON object with two fields:
1. "reasoning": Your step-by-step thought process
2. "next": Your decision on the next step ("researcher" or "done")

Example:
{
  "reasoning": "This query asks for factual information about quantum computing, which requires research.",
  "next": "researcher"
}
"""

This prompt establishes the coordinator’s decision-making role and provides a structured format for its responses, which helps with programmatic routing in our system.

Implementing the coordinator agent

Now, let’s implement the coordinator agent function that will analyze the state and determine the next step in the workflow:

# Define the agent functions
def coordinator_agent(messages):
    """Coordinator agent that manages the workflow between other agents."""
    # Add the system prompt to guide the coordinator agent's behavior
    coordinator_messages = [SystemMessage(content=COORDINATOR_SYSTEM_PROMPT)] + messages
    
    # Create a ChatOpenAI instance
    llm = ChatOpenAI(
        temperature=0.3,  # Lower temperature for more consistent decision-making
        model_name="gpt-4o",
        openai_api_key=os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY")
    )
    
    # Get a response from the LLM
    response = llm(coordinator_messages)
    
    # Parse the JSON response to get the next step
    try:
        response_content = response.content
        decision = json.loads(response_content)
        # Default to researcher if not specified
        next_step = decision.get("next", "researcher")  
        
        # Print the coordinator's reasoning
        print(f"Coordinator reasoning: {decision.get('reasoning', 'No reasoning provided')}")
        print(f"Next step: {next_step}")
    except Exception as e:
        # If there's an error parsing the JSON, default to the researcher
        print(f"Error parsing coordinator response: {e}")
        print(f"Defaulting to researcher agent")
        next_step = "researcher"
    
    return next_step

Notice that we’re using a lower temperature (0.3) for the coordinator compared to our other agents. This promotes consistent, reliable decision-making — exactly what we want from the “manager” of our system.

Building a dynamic multi-agent system

With our coordinator agent implemented, we can transform our system from a fixed, sequential workflow to a dynamic one where the coordinator decides which path to take:

# Function to run the multi-agent system
def run_multi_agent_system(question):
    """Run the multi-agent system with the given question."""
    print(f"\n\n{'='*50}")
    print(f"QUERY: {question}")
    print(f"{'='*50}\n")
    
    # Initialize the messages with the question
    messages = [HumanMessage(content=question)]
    
    # Start with the coordinator
    next_step = coordinator_agent(messages)
    
    # Continue until the coordinator decides we're done
    while next_step != "done":
        if next_step == "researcher":
            # Run the researcher agent
            researcher_response = researcher_agent(messages)
            messages.append(researcher_response)
            
            # Run the critic agent
            critic_response = critic_agent(messages)
            messages.append(critic_response)
            
            # Run the writer agent
            writer_response = writer_agent(messages)
            messages.append(writer_response)
            
            # Back to the coordinator
            next_step = coordinator_agent(messages)
        else:
            # If the next step is not recognized, default to done
            print(f"Unrecognized next step: {next_step}")
            next_step = "done"
    
    # Find the final response (last AI message)
    final_response = None
    for message in reversed(messages):
        if isinstance(message, AIMessage):
            final_response = message.content
            break
    
    if final_response:
        print("\n--- Final Response ---")
        print(final_response)
    
    return messages

This creates a dynamic workflow where:

1. The coordinator agent analyzes the user’s query and decides whether to engage the research team or provide a direct response
2. If research is needed, the query flows through our specialized agents: researcher → critic → writer
3. After the writer completes its work, control returns to the coordinator, which can either send the response to the user or initiate additional research
4. This creates a loop where complex queries can be refined through multiple iterations of research, critique, and writing

Visual workflow diagrams

Basic multi-agent system architecture

Let’s visualize our multi-agent system architecture using Mermaid diagrams:

Decision flow for different query types

Let’s also visualize how different types of queries flow through the system:

Detailed information flow diagram

Here’s a more detailed view of how information flows through our multi-agent system:

Zoom image will be displayed

The coordinator’s decision-making process

The coordinator agent makes decisions based on several factors:

Zoom image will be displayed

Seeing the dynamic system in action

Let’s see how our dynamic system handles different types of queries:

# Main execution
if __name__ == "__main__":
    print("Starting the multi-agent system...")
    
    # Test with different questions
    print("\n--- Testing with a complex research question ---")
    result1 = run_multi_agent_system("What are the latest advancements in renewable energy technologies and their potential impact on climate change?")
    
    print("\n--- Testing with a simple factual question ---")
    result2 = run_multi_agent_system("What is the capital of France?")
    
    print("\n--- Testing with a nuanced ethical question ---")
    result3 = run_multi_agent_system("What are the ethical implications of using AI in healthcare decision-making?")
    
    print("\nTesting complete!")

Example 1: Simple factual query

QUERY: What is the capital of France?

Coordinator reasoning:
This query is a straightforward factual question that requires specific information.

Next step: done

For simple factual queries, the coordinator can immediately determine that no complex research process is needed.

--- Testing with a simple factual question ---
==================================================
QUERY: What is the capital of France?
==================================================
Coordinator reasoning: This query is a straightforward factual 
question that requires specific information.
Next step: done

Example 2: Complex research query

QUERY: What are the latest advancements in renewable energy technologies and their potential impact on climate change?

Coordinator reasoning:
This query requires gathering up-to-date information on advancements in renewable energy technologies and their potential impact on climate change, which involves both research and analysis.

Next step: researcher

For complex research queries, the coordinator engages the full team of specialized agents to provide a comprehensive response.

Starting the multi-agent system...
--- Testing with a complex research question ---
==================================================
QUERY: What are the latest advancements in renewable energy technologies 
and their potential impact on climate change?
==================================================
Coordinator reasoning: This query requires gathering up-to-date 
information on advancements in renewable energy technologies and their 
potential impact on climate change, which involves both research and analysis.
Next step: researcher
--- Researcher Agent Response ---
Advancements in renewable energy technologies are crucial in combating 
climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to 
cleaner energy sources. Here are some of the latest advancements in 
renewable energy technologies and their potential impact on climate change:
1. **Solar ...
--- Critic Agent Response ---
While the overview of advancements in renewable energy technologies is 
generally accurate, there are a few areas where additional detail and 
clarification could enhance understanding and balance the perspective:
1. **Solar Power**:
   - **Perovskite Solar Cells**: While promising, perovskite solar ...
--- Writer Agent Response ---
In reviewing the latest advancements in renewable energy technologies 
and their potential impact on climate change, it is evident that these 
innovations play a crucial role in transitioning towards a sustainable 
energy future. Here's a refined overview with additional details and 
considerations for ...
Coordinator reasoning: The query seeks detailed information on the latest 
advancements in renewable energy technologies and their impact on climate 
change, requiring in-depth analysis and evaluation of each technology. 
The response provided an overview of advancements in solar, wind, hydropower, 
geothermal, and bioenergy, highlighting key developments and their 
implications. However, to ensure a comprehensive understanding, additional 
details and considerations were identified for each technology, including 
challenges, environmental impacts, and sustainability concerns. By addressing 
these aspects, the response aims to provide a more balanced and informative 
perspective on the topic.
Next step: done
--- Final Response ---
In reviewing the latest advancements in renewable energy technologies and 
their potential impact on climate change, it is evident that these innovations 
play a crucial role in transitioning towards a sustainable energy future. 
Here's a refined overview with additional details and considerations for a 
more comprehensive understanding:
1. **Solar Power**:
   - **Advancements**:
     - **Perovskite Solar Cells**: Despite their high efficiency, challenges 
         such as stability and toxicity due to lead content are being addressed 
         through ongoing research into alternative materials.
     - **Bifacial Solar Panels**: Environmental factors like snow coverage and 
         ground reflectivity impact their performance, with varying efficiency 
         based on installation conditions.
2. **Wind Power**:
   - **Advancements**:
     - **Floating Wind Turbines**: While promising for deep-water locations, 
         challenges include higher initial costs, maintenance complexities, 
         and grid integration issues.
     - **Larger Turbines**: Environmental and social considerations, such as 
         wildlife impacts and community acceptance, are crucial aspects to 
         consider alongside increased energy output.
3. **Hydropower**:
   - **Advancements**:
     - **Pumped Storage Hydropower**: Geographical and ecological constraints, 
         along with the need for suitable topography, influence the feasibility 
         and scalability of these systems.
     - **Run-of-River Hydropower**: Despite lower environmental impacts, 
         considerations around aquatic ecosystems and water quality management 
         remain significant.
4. **Geothermal Energy**:
   - **Advancements**:
     - **Enhanced Geothermal Systems**: Technical challenges in creating 
         artificial reservoirs and economic viability pose hurdles that 
         ongoing research aims to address.
     - **Direct-Use Applications**: Understanding the geographical limitations 
         of geothermal resources is essential for maximizing their 
         utilization in heating and cooling applications.
5. **Bioenergy**:
   - **Advancements**:
     - **Advanced Biofuels**: Sustainability concerns related to land use, 
         food security, and lifecycle emissions underscore the importance 
         of holistic assessments for biofuel deployment.
     - **Biogas Production**: Integration of biogas into circular economy 
         practices for waste management and agricultural applications 
         can enhance its role in emissions reduction.
         By acknowledging the complexities and considerations associated 
         with each renewable energy technology, including environmental 
         impacts, economic challenges, and policy implications, a more 
         nuanced understanding of their potential impact on climate 
         change emerges. Emphasizing the need for a holistic approach 
         that addresses not only technological advancements but also 
         broader sustainability aspects will be essential for maximizing 
         the benefits of renewable energy in combating climate change.

Example 3: Nuanced ethical question

QUERY: What are the ethical implications of using AI in healthcare decision-making?

Coordinator reasoning:
This query involves discussing the ethical implications of AI in healthcare, which requires a combination of research and critical evaluation.

Next step: researcher

For nuanced ethical questions, the coordinator recognizes the need for both factual information and critical analysis.

--- Testing with a nuanced ethical question ---
==================================================
QUERY: What are the ethical implications of using AI in healthcare 
decision-making?
==================================================
Coordinator reasoning: This query involves discussing the ethical 
implications of AI in healthcare, which requires a combination of 
research and critical evaluation.
Next step: researcher
--- Researcher Agent Response ---
Using AI in healthcare decision-making raises various ethical implications 
that need to be carefully considered. Here are some key points to consider:
1. **Privacy and Data Security**:
   - AI systems require access to vast amounts of patient data. Ensuring 
     the privacy and security of this data is ...
--- Critic Agent Response ---
Here are some additional points and questions to consider, as well as 
suggestions for strengthening your research:
1. **Regulatory and Ethical Guidelines**:
   - Explore existing regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines that 
     govern the use of AI in healthcare. How are they being implemented, 
     an...
--- Writer Agent Response ---
In response to the feedback provided, I have expanded on the ethical 
implications of using AI in healthcare decision-making and included 
additional points and questions to consider:
1. **Regulatory and Ethical Guidelines**:
   - Explore existing regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines that gov...
     Coordinator reasoning: The query delves into the ethical implications of 
     using AI in healthcare decision-making, which requires a comprehensive 
     analysis involving considerations such as privacy, transparency, bias, 
     patient autonomy, accountability, equity, and more. The response provided 
     an in-depth exploration of these ethical implications and suggested 
     additional points and questions to further enhance the understanding of
     the topic. To address the feedback provided, the response has been 
     expanded to include additional insights and considerations, offering a
     more holistic view of the ethical challenges and opportunities associated
     with AI in healthcare.
Next step: done
--- Final Response ---
In response to the feedback provided, I have expanded on the ethical 
implications of using AI in healthcare decision-making and included 
additional points and questions to consider:
1. **Regulatory and Ethical Guidelines**:
   - Explore existing regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines that 
     govern the use of AI in healthcare. How are they being implemented, 
     and are there any gaps that need to be addressed?
   - Consider the role of organizations like the FDA in regulating AI-based 
     healthcare technologies to ensure patient safety and ethical use.
2. **Human Oversight**:
   - While AI can enhance decision-making, the importance of human oversight 
     must be emphasized. How can healthcare systems ensure that AI 
     recommendations are critically evaluated by human experts?
   - Discuss the concept of shared decision-making between AI systems and 
     healthcare providers to leverage the strengths of both for optimal 
     patient care.
3. **Long-term Implications**:
   - Consider the long-term implications of AI integration in healthcare. 
     How might it change the patient-provider relationship over time? 
     What are the potential societal impacts?
   - Explore the concept of algorithmic bias and its long-term effects on 
     healthcare disparities, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring 
     and mitigation strategies.
4. **Education and Training**:
   - Healthcare professionals need to be educated about AI technologies and 
     their implications. What are the best practices for training healthcare 
     providers to effectively use and understand AI systems?
   - Highlight the importance of interdisciplinary education to bridge the 
     gap between healthcare and technology, fostering collaboration and 
     understanding among diverse stakeholders.
5. **International Perspectives**:
   - Consider how the ethical implications of AI in healthcare may vary 
     across different cultural and legal contexts. How do international 
     standards compare, and what can be learned from global approaches?
   - Explore case studies from different countries to understand how cultural 
     norms and healthcare systems influence the ethical considerations of AI 
     implementation in diverse settings.
6. **Patient Involvement**:
   - Investigate ways to actively involve patients in discussions about AI 
     in healthcare. How can patient feedback and perspectives be integrated 
     into the development and implementation of AI systems?
   - Discuss the concept of patient-centered AI design, where patient 
     preferences and values are incorporated into the development process 
     to ensure ethical and patient-friendly AI solutions.
7. **Success Stories and Challenges**:
   - Provide examples of successful AI applications in healthcare, as well 
     as challenges faced in real-world implementations. What lessons can be 
     learned from these experiences?
   - Highlight successful AI applications like IBM Watson for Oncology and 
     discuss challenges such as data interoperability and algorithmic 
     transparency that need to be addressed for widespread adoption and 
     ethical use of AI in healthcare.

By addressing these additional points and questions, a more thorough 
exploration of the ethical implications of using AI in healthcare 
decision-making can be achieved, offering valuable insights for policymakers, 
healthcare professionals, and researchers in the field.
Testing complete!

Benefits of the coordinator agent approach

1. Adaptive Workflow: The system can adapt its response strategy based on the nature of the query
2. Efficient Resource Use: Simple queries bypass unnecessary processing steps
3. Iterative Refinement: Complex queries can go through multiple rounds of research and refinement
4. Scalable Architecture: New specialized agents can be easily integrated into the system
5. Improved Response Quality: Each query receives the appropriate level of attention and expertise

The coordinator agent transforms a collection of specialized AI agents into a cohesive, intelligent system capable of handling a wide range of queries with appropriate depth and efficiency. By implementing this architecture, we create a multi-agent system that can:

1. Intelligently route queries based on their complexity and requirements
2. Provide direct answers to simple questions without unnecessary processing
3. Engage specialized agents for complex queries requiring research and analysis
4. Iteratively refine responses through multiple rounds of feedback when needed

This approach represents a significant step forward in building AI systems that can adapt their workflow to the specific needs of each user query, delivering more relevant, efficient, and high-quality responses.

Conclusion

While Clearwater Analytics developed CWIC Flow as a sophisticated multi-agent system before frameworks like LangGraph became available, we continue to evaluate emerging technologies to enhance our capabilities. In the next article, we’ll explore how to build multi-agent systems using LangGraph, a framework that provides structured workflows similar to what we’ve already implemented in CWIC Flow.

As AI technology evolves, Clearwater remains committed to adopting innovations that enhance our ability to deliver actionable insights to our clients while maintaining our industry-leading standards for security, compliance, and accuracy.

---

About the author

Rany ElHousieny is an Engineering Leader at Clearwater Analytics with over 30 years of experience in software development, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. He has held leadership roles at Microsoft for two decades, where he led the NLP team at Microsoft Research and Azure AI, contributing to advancements in AI technologies. At Clearwater, Rany continues to leverage his extensive background to drive innovation in AI, helping teams solve complex challenges while maintaining a collaborative approach to leadership and problem-solving.