Generating diverse questions for LLM instruction fine-tuning: Strategies and considerations

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed the landscape of natural language processing, yet their potential can be significantly elevated through the practice of instruction fine-tuning. A vital element in this process involves the sourcing of high-quality, diverse questions to train these models effectively. In this blog post, we will examine various strategies for obtaining or generating these questions, considering aspects such as cost, accuracy, and time efficiency.

1. Utilizing Existing Question Sets

In certain instances, you might find a pre-existing question set that aligns with your specific domain or task.

Pros:

• Exceptional accuracy and relevance.
• Available for immediate use.
• Often curated by domain experts.

Cons:

• Suitable pre-existing sets are rare.
• High cost if purchased commercially.
• May not encompass all required question types or topics.

Cost: Can be high if purchased, but potentially free if you already own it.
Accuracy: Very high.
Time: Minimal (immediate availability).

2. Expert-Created Questions

Gathering a team of subject matter experts to generate questions tailored to your needs.

Pros:

• High quality and relevance.
• Customized to specific requirements.
• Incorporates specialized knowledge.

Cons:

• Can be expensive and time-consuming.
• Potential lack of diversity if the team is small.
• Issues with scalability for larger sets of questions.

Cost: High (expert time is valuable).
Accuracy: High.
Time: Slow (depends on team size and question set complexity).

3. Mining Existing Platforms

Extracting questions from platforms such as Microsoft Teams, Reddit, or Stack Exchange.

Pros:

• Access to real-world, diverse questions.
• Large volume of available inquiries.
• Relatively low costs.

Cons:

• Requires data cleaning and filtering.
• Risk of low-quality or irrelevant questions.
• Potential privacy and legal issues.
• May require expert review for accuracy.

Cost: Low to moderate (primarily computational resources and data access).
Accuracy: Moderate (requires filtering and potential expertise).
Time: Moderate (dependent on data volume and processing needs).

4. LLM-Generated Questions

Using existing language models to create questions based on provided text.

Pros:

• Highly scalable and quick.
• Capable of generating various question types.
• Generally low cost after initial setup.

Cons:

• Quality may vary.
• Requires careful prompt design.
• Possible model biases or hallucinations.

Cost: Moderate (includes computational resources and potential API costs).
Accuracy: Moderate to high (depends on model and filtering).
Time: Fast (large volumes can be generated quickly).

5. Hybrid Approach

Combining multiple methods, such as LLM-generated questions alongside expert review.

Pros:

• Balances speed, cost, and accuracy.
• Utilizes the strengths of various approaches.
• Highly customizable.

Cons:

• More complex to implement.
• Requires careful coordination of different methods.
• Potentially significant human effort involved.

Cost: Moderate to high (depends on the specific combination used).
Accuracy: High.
Time: Moderate (faster than manual processes, slower than fully automated systems).

Selecting the Right Strategy

When determining the best strategy for crafting questions to fine-tune LLMs, it is essential to evaluate your specific needs, available resources, and constraints. Many applications benefit from a hybrid approach, which often strikes the best balance between quality, diversity, and efficiency.

Now, let’s dive into generating a range of question types, focusing on the importance of question diversity and document chunking for larger texts.

The Significance of Question Diversity

Creating a variety of question types is crucial for comprehensive LLM training. Consider these essential categories with finance-related examples:

• Simple Questions: These straightforward inquiries assess basic comprehension and fact retrieval abilities. Example: “What is the primary purpose of the stock market?”
• Thought-Provoking Questions: These challenge the model to analyze and evaluate financial scenarios. Example: “What impact could a significant recession have on the global job market?”
• Integrative Questions: These require connecting information from different sections of a financial report or analysis. Example: “How do the company’s earnings in the latest quarter correlate with its debt levels from the previous year?”
• Questions with No Direct Answers: Such questions encourage the model to generalize knowledge beyond the provided text. Example: “What potential trends in green finance could emerge over the next decade?”
• Questions with Incorrect Premises: These challenge the model’s ability to recognize and correct inaccuracies. Example: “Assuming that all companies have equal access to capital, how would this affect competition in the market?”

These examples illustrate the importance of diverse question types in training LLMs to tackle a wide range of financial discussions and analyses effectively.

Techniques for Generating Diverse Questions

To effectively generate a wide array of questions, several advanced techniques can be employed. These methods help ensure that questions are varied, relevant, and tailored to the content being analyzed:

• Named Entity Recognition (NER): Utilize NER to identify key entities in financial texts, such as companies, financial instruments, or economic indicators. This allows for the creation of questions focused on specific entities. Example: “What were the main contributors to Apple’s revenue growth in 2022?”
• Dependency Parsing: Analyze sentence structures to understand the grammatical relationships between words. This technique helps generate questions that target specific financial relationships. Example: “How does rising inflation influence interest rates?”
• Coreference Resolution: Identify different mentions of the same entity throughout the text to generate questions that require contextual understanding. Example: “How did Tesla’s strategy differ from Ford’s in addressing electric vehicle demand?”
• Semantic Role Labeling: Assess the roles of various elements in sentences to create questions about actions, agents, and objects within financial contexts. Example: “Who are the key players influencing the stock market, and what roles do they play?”
• Topic Modeling: Use methods like Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to classify the main topics within a financial document. Subsequently, generate questions that delve into these topics. Example: “What are the emerging trends in renewable energy investments?”
• Contradiction Generation: Formulate questions that present false premises or incorrect assumptions, prompting the model to analyze and correct inaccuracies. Example: “If all cryptocurrencies are considered safe investments, how might this impact traditional banking sectors?”

By utilizing these techniques, question generation can be made more robust and diverse, enhancing the training dataset for LLMs and enabling them to engage with content in a more nuanced manner.

Chunking Large Documents

When working with extensive documents, many LLMs encounter limitations due to their restricted context window. To effectively manage large texts, various chunking strategies can be employed. Here are some effective methods for segmenting documents:

• Fixed-size Chunking: Divide the document into uniform segments of a predetermined size (e.g., 50K tokens), ensuring that there is a slight overlap between chunks to maintain context continuity. This method helps capture relevant information across adjacent sections.
• Sentence-based Chunking: Break the document into chunks based on complete sentences. This approach avoids splitting sentences, ensuring that each chunk retains grammatical integrity and contextual meaning.
• Paragraph-based Chunking: Use natural breaks in the text, such as paragraph divisions, to create chunks. If necessary, short paragraphs can be combined to achieve an optimal size while preserving the coherence of the information.
• Semantic Chunking: Utilize topic modeling or text segmentation algorithms to divide the document based on thematic coherence. This method groups together related content, allowing for more meaningful question generation from each segment.
• Hierarchical Chunking: Construct a multi-tiered representation of the document, starting with high-level summaries and breaking them down into more detailed sub-chunks. This approach helps to retain the document’s overall structure while allowing for targeted question generation at various levels of detail.

By using these chunking strategies, we can effectively manage large documents, ensuring that important information is preserved and easily accessible for generating high-quality, contextually relevant questions. Each chunking method serves a specific purpose depending on the document type and the questions being formed. For instance, semantic chunking is particularly effective for integrative questions, as it groups related content together to foster better question formulation based on thematic coherence.

In contrast, hierarchical chunking is ideal for documents with a clear structure, such as regulatory texts. This approach allows for the generation of questions from specific chunks while providing contextual support from the next level in the hierarchy. By maintaining the document’s structural integrity, hierarchical chunking enables the creation of questions that are both relevant and contextually informed.

Additionally, the other chunking methods offer flexibility in terms of chunk size and uniformity, allowing users to tailor the document breakdown to their specific needs.

Overall, these strategies enhance the training process for language models, improving their ability to comprehend and generate responses based on complex financial information.

Implementing Effective Question Generation

To generate high-quality questions effectively, several strategies can be employed. Here’s a look at various approaches, emphasizing the use of rules to guide LLM prompts in hybrid methods:

• Rule-based Approaches: Develop clear templates and guidelines for transforming declarative statements into questions. This could involve identifying key elements of the text (such as subject, action, and object) and applying rules to restructure these elements into coherent questions.
• Machine Learning Approaches: Train specialized models for question generation using datasets like SQuAD or MS MARCO. These models can learn to produce contextually relevant questions, benefiting from extensive examples.
• Prompt Engineering with Guiding Rules: Design effective prompts that incorporate specific rules to steer LLMs in generating questions. For instance, prompts can include instructions on the type of question to be created (e.g., “Generate a thought-provoking question about the implications of a stock market downturn”) or specify the context and focus areas.
• Hybrid Approaches: Combine the rule-based strategies with LLM capabilities to optimize question generation. Use established rules to structure the initial inputs for the LLM, allowing it to generate diverse questions while maintaining relevance and coherence. For example, start with a rule that identifies key financial metrics in a report, then prompt the LLM to create questions based on these metrics.

By integrating rules into the prompt design process, we can enhance the effectiveness of LLMs, ensuring that the generated questions are not only diverse but also contextually relevant and precise. This combined approach maximizes the strengths of both rule-based methods and the generative capabilities of LLMs, producing high-quality questions suitable for training purposes.

Ensuring Quality of Generated Questions

To uphold high standards in the quality of generated questions, a comprehensive approach can be employed that leverages both human review and automated metrics. This combined strategy helps ensure that the questions are coherent, relevant, and diverse, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of training datasets. Here are key practices to consider:

• Dynamic Filtering Mechanisms: Implement filtering rules that are informed by insights from both human reviews and automated metrics. By analyzing which questions meet quality standards, these filters can be iteratively refined to eliminate low-quality or nonsensical questions from the dataset while retaining those that provide value.
• Human Review: Utilize human assessors to evaluate a representative subset of generated questions. Their qualitative feedback can identify patterns of quality and relevance, which can then inform the development of more effective filtering rules. This human touch ensures that nuanced considerations are taken into account, enhancing the overall quality of the questions.
• Automated Metrics: Incorporate metrics such as perplexity and ROUGE scores to quantitatively assess the coherence and relevance of the questions. The results from these metrics can guide the refinement of filtering processes and indicate areas where the generation methods may need adjustment.
• Iterative Refinement: Establish a continuous feedback loop where human and automated evaluations drive the evolution of filtering rules. As the question generation process is refined, the filtering criteria can adapt, improving the quality and relevance of questions over time.
• Diversity Specifications: Define clear guidelines about the ideal composition of different question types within the dataset. For example, specify that a certain percentage of questions should be simple, thought-provoking, integrative, or based on incorrect premises. This structured approach to diversity helps ensure that the generated question pool covers a broad range of inquiry types, enriching the training data and preparing LLMs for a variety of discussions.

By integrating these practices, organizations can enhance the quality of generated questions significantly, ensuring they are relevant, diverse, and effective in training LLMs to understand and generate meaningful content.

Conclusion

Generating high-quality, diverse questions from text is a vital component in the instruction fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs). As we’ve demonstrated, this is a complex space that requires a thoughtful approach to ensure the effectiveness of training datasets. By employing various techniques — such as refining document chunking methods, utilizing rule-based strategies to guide LLM prompts, and implementing rigorous quality control through dynamic filtering and iterative refinement — we can create comprehensive and valuable training resources.

The incorporation of diverse question types not only improves the model’s ability to engage with complex topics but also equips it to produce more nuanced responses. By defining clear specifications for the distribution of different question types, we can maintain a balanced and varied dataset that fosters robust learning outcomes.

Recognizing the intricacies and complexities of this process, we have chosen to partner with Talc, a company that specializes in question generation, to enhance our capabilities in this area. Our collaboration with Talc allows us to leverage their expertise while ensuring the generated questions align with the specific needs of our domain. Additionally, we engage our internal subject matter experts to validate a sampling of the questions, ensuring their relevance and accuracy.

As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, refining our question generation techniques in partnership with Talc will be essential for maximizing the potential of LLMs. By focusing on continuous improvement and utilizing both external expertise and internal validation, we are committed to developing AI systems that demonstrate deeper understanding and nuanced interaction with human language, particularly in the domain.

---

About the Author

Dan Siddall, a Staff Data Scientist at Clearwater Analytics, is a seasoned expert in generative AI and machine learning, with a comprehensive understanding of the entire ML lifecycle from development to production deployment. Recognized for his innovative problem-solving skills and ability to lead cross-functional teams, Dan leverages his extensive software engineering background and strong communication abilities to bridge the gap between complex AI concepts and practical business solutions.